CovarianceEstimation.jl

Lightweight robust covariance estimation in Julia
Popularity
42 Stars
Updated Last
9 Months Ago
Started In
November 2018
Status Coverage Docs
CI codecov.io

CovarianceEstimation.jl

Lightweight robust covariance estimation in Julia i.e. if you have a data matrix X of size n×p corresponding to n observations with p features, this package will help you to obtain an estimator of the covariance matrix of size p×p associated with this data.

Note: if you are interested in covariance estimation in the context of a linear regression, consider for now the package CovarianceMatrices.jl which focuses around that case.

Quick start

using CovarianceEstimation

X = randn(5, 7)

S_uncorrected  = cov(SimpleCovariance(), X)
S_corrected    = cov(SimpleCovariance(corrected=true), X)

# using linear shrinkage with different targets
LSE = LinearShrinkage
# - Ledoit-Wolf target + shrinkage
method = LSE(ConstantCorrelation())
S_ledoitwolf = cov(method, X)
# - Chen target + shrinkage (using the more verbose call)
method = LSE(target=DiagonalCommonVariance(), shrinkage=:rblw)
S_chen_rblw = cov(method, X)
method = LSE(target=DiagonalCommonVariance(), shrinkage=:oas)
S_chen_oas = cov(method, X)

# a pre-defined shrinkage can be used as well
method = LinearShrinkage(DiagonalUnitVariance(), 0.5)
# using a given shrinkage
S_05 = cov(method, X)

Currently supported algorithms

In this section, X is the data matrix of size n × p, S is the sample covariance matrix with S = κ (Xc' * Xc) where κ is either n (uncorrected) or n-1 (corrected) and Xc is the centred data matrix (see docs).

  • SimpleCovariance: basic corrected or uncorrected sample covariance (implemented in StatsBase.jl).

Time complexity: O(p²n) with a low constant

Sample covariance based methods

These methods build an estimator of the covariance derived from S. They are implemented using abstract covariance estimation interface from StatsBase.jl.

  • LinearShrinkage: James-Stein type estimator of the form (1-λ)S+λF where F is a target and λ∈[0,1] a shrinkage intensity.
    • common targets are implemented following the taxonomy given in [1] along with Ledoit-Wolf optimal shrinkage intensities [2].
    • in the case of the DiagonalCommonVariance target, a Rao-Blackwellised Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage (:rblw) and Oracle-Approximating shrinkage (:oas) are also supported (see [3]).
    • Note: S is symmetric semi-positive definite so that if the F is symmetric positive definite and provided λ is non-zero, the estimator obtained after shrinkage is also symmetric positive definite. For the diagonal targets DiagonalUnitVariance, DiagonalCommonVariance and DiagonalUnequalVariance the target is necessarily SPD.
  • AnalyticalNonlinearShrinkage: estimator of the form MΛM' where M and Λ are matrices derived from the eigen decomposition of S.[4]
  • WoodburyEstimator: estimator of the form σ²I + U * Λ * U', where I is the identity matrix, U is low rank semi-orthogonal, and Λ is diagonal. This form is well-suited to very high-dimensional problems.[6]
  • BiweightMidcovariance: robust estimator, described more in the documentation.[5]

Time complexity:

  • Linear shrinkage: O(p²n) with a low constant (main cost is forming S)
  • Nonlinear shrinkage:
    • if p<n: O(p²n + n²) with a moderate constant (main cost is forming S and manipulating a matrix of elements)
    • if p>n: O(p³) with a low constant (main cost is computing the eigen decomposition of S).
  • Biweight midcovariance: O(p²n)

Other estimators (coming)

These are estimators that may be implemented in the future, see also this review paper.

  • Sparsity based estimators for either the covariance or the precision
  • Rank based approaches
  • POET
  • HAC
  • ...

For HAC (and other estimators of covariance of coefficient of regression models) you can currently use the CovarianceMatrices.jl package.

Comparison to existing libraries

Rough benchmarks are run over random matrices of various sizes (40x20, 20x40, 400x200, 200x400). These benchmarks should (as usual) be taken with a pinch of salt but essentially a significant speedup should be expected for a standard problem.

  • Sklearn (implements DiagonalCommonVariance target with oas and lw shrinkage)
    • average speedup: 5x
  • Corpcor (implements DiagonalUnequalVariance target with ss shrinkage)
    • average speedup: 22x
  • Ledoit-Wolf 1 (implements ConstantCorrelation target with lw shrinkage, we used Octave for the comparison)
    • average speedup: 12x
  • Ledoit-Wolf 2 (implements AnalyticalNonlinearShrinkage)
    • average speedup: 25x
  • Astropy (implements BiweightMidcovariance)
    • average speedup: 3x

References